“Catalyzing
a bloody encounter”, “gang assault’, “acted like savages”; (Candiotti, Watkins, & Botelho, 10/2013) anyone who watches or
listens to national news is fully aware of the assault a group of bikers
created against a family of three. This story has become headline news for over
a week, breaking news coverage’s across the nation has produced and investigated
the story bringing to light story after story, which all seem to have a few
things not in common. News organizations such as CNN, FOX, NBC, and ABC have
given this story top priority, giving the viewers all of the facts, all while
creating some un-parallels.
A
family of three, husband, wife and two-year-old, were driving down the freeway
in an SUV. An extremely large group of street bikers surrounded the SUV forcing
the SUV to stop. Fearing for their lives, the family of three immediately took
off, striking three bikers with the SUV. Eventually coming to another stop because
of traffic
conditions, the SUV was surrounded by the group once again, while one
particular biker attempted to open the door of the SUV. Immediately taking off
again, the SUV tried to get away, but to no avail, the driver of the SUV was
pulled out of the vehicle and beaten. There has been major controversy as to
who is to blame. (Candiotti,
Watkins, & Botelho, 10/2013)
News
organization: CNN was the only media coverage to give as much information about
the story as possible. CNN gave full facts, allowed quotes from the bikers,
family of the bikers, and the family of three involved in the attack. Reading
CNN’s article, there was no visual bias, and CNN did not allow any fingers to
be pointed. One unique fact CNN had delivered, was the investigation now
derived about one undercover cop who was a part of the bikers, and visualized
the attack without intervening. This undercover cop had not wanted to “blow his
cover”. (Candiotti, Watkins, & Botelho, 10/2013)
News
organization: Fox News was extremely bias while covering the story of Bikers
vs. SUV. Using phrases such as: “Catalyzing a bloody encounter”, naming the
assault as a “gang assault” and blaming the first motorcyclist by stating he
“set into motion a chain of catastrophic events”. Fox news also “threw under
the bus” a few of the bikers by explaining most were unemployed and are working
as “food workers”. (FOXNews.com,
10/2013) It’s crystal clear which side of the playing field lays Fox News. Fox
News is quick to point fingers to the bikers, and putting the bystander who
intervened on a pedestal, hailing him a “hero”. The difference in Fox News’
investigation is that they were quick to say there were no undercover
cops involved in the attack, or even witnessed such attack. (FOXNews.com, 10/2013)
News
organization: NBC immediately investigated the possibility that there were not
just one, but six undercover cops involved or who had witnessed this attack
without lending hand, or intervening. NBC seems to have just a “juicy story”
but is without sources and facts. NBC failed to release any quotes or witness
statements. The journalist who covered this story, produced a witness that
stated a “biker went for the wife” (NBCnews.com, 10/2013); although all other
coverage’s explained the wife and toddler were not touched or harmed in any
way. (NBCnews.com, 10/2013)
News
organization ABC News, gave very little information, but created a story much
like NBC. ABC News explained there were two undercover cops, one an undercover
narcotics cop. This news coverage also stated there were 3 other undercover
cops nearby who could have intervened. ABC News produced existing police
records of some of the bikers, stating they have prior criminal convictions.
Similar to NBC, there was one witness statement that a biker did indeed come
after the wife. There are no other facts, statements or information given. (Shaw, 10/2013)
It
is clear, that in the information given by all News Organizations: CNN, FOX News,
NBC News, and ABC News, could be completely different and inaccurate. The
investigative reporters did however produce the main facts precisely, due to
the fact there was clear evidence of the entire attack given from a YouTube
Video. (Candiotti, Watkins, & Botelho, 10/2013) Every encounter not
seen from the YouTube video, tends to be different and inaccurate, for example
every news organization besides CNN gave a different account of the undercover
cops who were or were not involved. CNN did not give account of any undercover
cops, maybe due to the lack of information provided. All of the names News
Organization provided a story for the viewers, recounting the attack upon a
family of three; however, every News Organization gave a completely different
statement, some becoming bias on the attack, and some with hardly any
information.
Candiotti, S., Watkins, T., &
Botelho, G. (10/06/2013). New York Police: Bikers Stomped on SUV driver.
Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/06/us/bikers-attack-video/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
FOXNews.com. (10/06/2013). More Bikers
Face Charges in NYC beating of SUV driver. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/06/two-off-duty-police-officers-may-have-been-in-frenzied-motorcycle-group-reports/
NBCnews.com. (10/06/2013). Police
Arrest another Biker. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/53204387/#53204387
Shaw, A. (10/06/2013). NYPD
Investigation of Off-Duty Cops. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/US/off-duty-cops-witnessed-alleged-suv-driver-beating/story?id=20488628&page=2